Surprising Changes in Per Capita American Food Consumption


 
Public domain photograph of various meats. (Be...

Image via Wikipedia

Image via Wikipedia

Surprising Changes in Per Capita American Food Consumption

“It is not government’s job to mandate responsibility on
our behalf. We have the intelligence and good sense to
make wise consumption choices for ourselves and our
children. It is up to us to do what is best for our
health and our children’s health.
- Michael Crapo (U.S. Senator from Idaho)

What’s happened to meat and dairy consumption
during the 2-decade period between 1990 and 2010?

According to the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA):


http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodConsumption/

Per capita consumption of red meat dropped from
119.4 pounds to 111.7 pounds.

Per capita consumption of chicken increased from
60.6 pounds to 80.0 pounds.

Per capita consumption of liquid milk dropped from
233.3 pounds to 203.4 pounds.

Per capita consumption of cheese rose from
38 pounds to 43.6 pounds.

Bad publicity and real science about milk most
certainly contributed to the decline, but consumers
have been scared into eating additional cheese by
those people who market and promote dairy products
by using calcium scare tactics.

What a mistake! I should have simultaneously become the
UnCheeseman at the same time I became the NotMilkman.

More Bad News For the Animal Rights Movement (& Chickens)

Clearly, the animal rights movement is not waging
a very effective campaign. After first becoming involved
in the AR movement in 1995, I’ve noted how AR groups
have focused upon the plight of abused chickens.

From 1995 until 2000, activists and lobbyists have
increased their altruistic efforts in creating greater
public awareness of the horrible nature in which
chickens live and die. How they are de-beaked. How they
are confined. How they are killed without first being
stunned. By promoting compassionate slaughter laws,
AR organizations have relieved the guilt of chicken
eaters, who now enjoy eating more chicken by supposedly
doing so compassionately.

While red meat consumption has declined by 6.54 percent,
chicken consumption has increased by 32.3 percent!
Overall, the consumption of red meat and chicken
resulted in a combined increase over the past 20
years from 180 pounds per person to 191.7 pounds
per person. That represents a 6.5 percent increase.

Since ten pounds of milk are required to produce one
pound of hard cheese, the dairy “influence” has increased
from 613.3 pounds of liquid milk plus the milk required to
produce the cheese to a whopping 639.4 pounds per person
which represents an actual 4.25 percent increase.

As for the animal rights movement, ask yourself why it is
that total meat and chicken consumption and total dairy
and cheese consumption have increased during the past
20 years? Are the dollars altruistic people donate to
animal rights groups being wasted by huge AR salaries
and groups that make animal welfare their priority?
Larger cages and easier ways for animals to die show
results which A.R. groups distort. The proof is in the
Yorkshire pudding

(Note: Yorkshire pudding is made with milk, eggs,
and fat drippings from the roasted beast.)

Robert Cohen

http://www.notmilk.com

Autism & Dairy Consumption: A New, Dangerous, Connection


Dairy products and their production

Image via Wikipedia

Autism and Dairy Consumption: A New Connection

“Autism is the fastest growing developmental
disability in our nation.”
- Mary Bono

Notmilk has previously reported a dairy link to autism,
blaming a naturally occurring opiate in dairy products,
casomorphin (also found in organic milk and raw milk)
to attention deficit order and autism. See:


http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/notmilk/message/2640

I have been away from my home base for about 14 days,
and before I left, four readers responded to a Notmilk
column by asking:

“If ADHD and pesticides are linked, have there been
recent peer-reviewed publications linking pesticides
in milk to autism?” The 10/19 column:


http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/notmilk/message/4156

I had not heard of one, but I investigated the issue.

Here is what was found:

The August, 2011 issue of the journal of Occupational
and Behavioral Medicine included a study in which
behavioral impairment in children was correlated
to levels of excreted pesticide residues in their urine.

Researchers at the University of Florida (Xu, et. al.)
determined that groups of children with low and high
trichlorophenol levels and high trichlorophenol had a
higher level of behavioral impairment than children
who tested for levels below the limits of detection.

Trichlorophenol pesticides are presently not regulated by
the Food and Drug Admistation. You can buy one metric ton
for about $1,000 plus shipping directly to your door.

“Indeed, the largest contributors to daily intake of
chlorinated insecticides are dairy products, meat,
fish, and poultry.”
- Living Downstream, by Sandra Steingraber, Ph.D.

Consider: It’s in the milk and 40% of our diet is dairy.
Consider: 10 Lbs. of milk are needed to make 1 Lb. of cheese.
Consider: 12 Lbs. of milk are needed to make 1 Lb. of ice cream.
Consider: 21 Lbs. of milk are needed to make 1 Lb. of butter.

Do you ever get a “brain fog?” If you continue to
consume dairy, do you doubt that dairy affects adults
in the same manner it might affect children, or do you
imagine that age offers one an immunity from opiates
and pesticides?

Children sometimes get autism.
Adults sometimes get “duh” moments.

Robert Cohen

http://www.notmilk.com

The Latest China Study


Food for Life distributes food on an internati...

Image via Wikipedia

The Latest China Study

“Usually, the first thing a country does in the course
of economic development is to introduce a lot of livestock.
Our data are showing that this is not a very smart move
and the Chinese are listening. They are realizing that
animal-based agriculture is not the way to go…We are
basically a vegetarian species and should be eating a
wide variety of plant food and minimizing our intake of
animal foods…Once people start introducing animal
products into their diet, that’s when the mischief starts.”
- T. Colin Campbell, Ph.D.

Nutrition & Metabolism is a British peer-reviewed
scientific journal which (according to their website)

“…publishes content focused on the integration of
nutrition, exercise physiology, clinical investigations,
and molecular and cellular biochemistry of metabolism.”

The September 19, 2011 issue of Nutrition & Metabolism
includes an study that analyzed the thickness and
integrity of the carotid artery in 171 vegetarian males
and compared them to the carotid arteries of 129 meat
eating age-related males (the control group). The
researchers also factored in the length of time
that their vegetarian subjects ate a plant based diet.

Tests measuring the thickness of arterial walls have
been used to determine and predict future cardiovascular risk.
The researchers concluded that vegetarians experience:

“A decrease in multiple cardiovascular risk factors such
as a decrease in body mass index, blood pressure and lipid
profile was associated with vegetarian diet. Moreover,
taking a low-calorie, low-protein, or vegetarian diet might
have great beneficial effects on arterial wall thickness through
improved lipid profile, and the beneficial effects appeared
to be correlated with the duration of vegetarian diet.”

Robert Cohen

http://www.notmilk.com

A Cardinal Sin


A Cardinal Sin “The cardinal responsibility of leadership is to identify the dominant contradiction at each point of the historical process and to work out a central line to resolve it.” – Mao Tse-Tung

Yesterday (10/28/2011), a case of E. coli was reported in a St. Louis man who will most likely not be celebrating last evening’s game-seven world series baseball win by his home team Cardinals over the Texas Rangers.


http://www.bnd.com/2011/10/28/1919608/

e-coli-reported-in-st-clair-county.html An excerpt from the News-Democrat report: “

The infection has sickened 23 people between the ages of 11 to 94 in the St. Louis area. Six of those sickened were hospitalized…The bacteria is most often spread through the consumption of contaminated foods, the consumption of unpasteurized milk, drinking non-disinfected water, contact with cattle and contact with the feces of infected people.” Early this morning, news of another possible raw milk infection story hit the newswires.


http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/28/health/

north-carolina-e-coli/ Coincidentally, yesterday I was personally attacked in a well distributed raw milk newsletter as being as being: “…biologically savvy as molten lead.” That may be true, but there is one cardinal rule that is beyond debate: raw milk drinkers continue to get sick from bacterial infections and die. October 28, 201 (CNN)

 ”Ten cases of E. coli infection have been confirmed and another 16 cases are under investigation in what may be a growing disease outbreak that appears to be linked to the North Carolina State Fair, state public health officials said Friday…” Lead becomes molten at 327.5 degrees Celsius. Having reported hundreds of cases of raw milk infection in the Notmilk letter over the years, and having equally related hundreds of links to peer-reviewed scientific research regarding cancer, heart disease, bone disease, asthma, diabetes, and hundreds of other diseases whose etiology can be traced directly to milk and dairy consumption, I am proud to be compared to molten lead by raw dairy advocates. Molten lead is hot. Lately, I’ve been hot too!

Just like the newly crowned world champion St. Louis Cardinals.

 ;>) Robert Cohen

http://www.notmilk.com

Powerful Mobilization Against Legislation Banning Vegetarian Schoolchildren from Cafeterias



http://www.icdv.info/index.php?post/2011/10/24/

The decree can be read in French at
http://tinyurl.com/DecretCantines
.

Powerful-mobilization -against-legislation-banning-vegetarian-schoolchildren-from-cafeteri as Powerful mobilization against legislation banning vegetarian schoolchildren from cafeterias Press Release (October 24, 2011)

 Powerful mobilization against legislation banning vegetarian schoolchildren from cafeterias Seventeen organizations call for a gathering this Wednesday 26 October in front of the French Ministry of Agriculture to demand the repeal of decree 2011-1277 and of the accompanying governmental order that ban vegetarianism from public and private school cafeterias. In less than one week, over six thousand signatures have been collected demanding the repeal of these regulations. Numerous foreign organizations and individuals support the initiative and are preparing to express their dissatisfaction to the French embassies of their countries.

The Citizens’ Initiative for the Rights of Vegetarians (ICDV) points out the contradiction between these acts of the French government and the right of freedom of conscience as established by the United Nations declaration of human rights, which includes the right to live in accordance with one’s beliefs. Powerful mobilization against the recent regulations concerning catering services Wednesday 26 October, at 11:30 am, a protest will be held in front of the office of the General Administration of Food (DGAL) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, 251 rue de Vaugirard in Paris.

 Additionally, a petition demanding the repeal of decree number 2011-1277 and of its accompanying order has gathered over six thousand signatures in less than one week, many coming from abroad. Numerous foreign organizations, vegetarian or not, have been offended by France’s failure to uphold the freedom of belief and by the measures making it impossible for vegetarian children to nourish themselves properly in school cafeterias. Viva!, an English organization, issued a press release entitled “Having Banned the Burqa, French Now Ban Les Veggies.”

The decrees The decree 2011-1227 of 30 September 2011 and the order of 30 September 2011, published in the Journal Officiel on 2 October 2011, quite simply make vegetarianism illegal in school cafeterias. They do so first by making the regular presence of meat and fish in the meals mandatory, hence preventing vegetarian students from eating in the cafeterias every day; secondly, by making it such that those cafeterias up to now have offered alternative menus are now illegal (1).

The position of the Citizens’ Initiative for the Rights of Vegetarians Numerous people throughout the world are deeply convinced that the consumption of animals and of the products of animal exploitation is wrong. Vegetarianism and veganism are the inescapable practical expressions of this belief. The recent governmental regulations undermine the fundamental individual liberties by limiting the free exercise of personal belief as proclaimed by the United Nations: “Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have a religion or whatever belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.” (2)

“Isn’t it right for the government to ensure that school cafeterias serve well-balanced meals?” “Certainly, so long as alternatives are taken into account,” answers David Olivier, spokesperson of the ICDV. “The decree and order specify that every meal is to include a ‘protein dish,’ which is to be exclusively of animal origins (meat, fish, eggs, or cheese), thus disregarding the abundant availability of forms of plant protein. They also impose dairy products in every meal, purportedly because it is the only way to cover the needs for calcium, disregarding the plant and mineral alternatives. It is quite possible to devise well-balanced vegetarian and even vegan meals, as is regularly done in other countries.” “By imposing such an abundance of animal products under the pretext of offering schoolchildren well-balanced meals, the government spreads the idea that only a meat-based diet can satisfy dietary needs. Furthermore, it places vegetarian children in front of the following dilemma: to consume animals, despite their beliefs, or to eat inadequate meals – sometimes just bread and water ­ which flies in the face of the stated goal of the regulations.” “Whoever is unhappy with the school cafeterias can simply choose to feed their children at home!” “Not all parents of vegetarian children are in a situation that allows them to bring them home for lunch or to hire a nanny,” notes Agnese Pignataro, mother of a three-year-old girl. “To impose such a solution would be to discriminate against the less affluent families. Moreover, by depriving children of the opportunity to socialize in the school cafeteria, this decree makes the children’s beliefs a cause of marginalization. Freedom of belief also implies that the parents have the right to choose for their children an education in agreement with their own convictions.” “Must school cafeterias conform to each and every demand?” “Cafeterias are a service that satisfies a need,” points out Sara Fergé, schoolteacher. “Thus they must adapt to the needs of those who use them ­ the students, the teachers and other members of staff ­ rather than the reverse. That is how it is in other countries, where the cafeterias offer multiple choices every day, including a vegetarian menu, since these choices are designed with the needs of the population in mind. Why is it that what is possible elsewhere seems impossible in France?” Because they prevent vegetarian children from having access to a well-balanced diet in school cafeterias, because they spread the idea that only meat-based meals can be nutritionally well balanced, because they violate the principle of freedom of belief, the Citizens’ Initiative for the Rights of Vegetarians demands the repeal of these laws that impose the consumption of animal products in school cafeterias. Signed by: Animal Amnistie (Toulouse) ; Animalsace ; APSARES ; Aquitaine décroissance ; Association Végétarienne & Végétalienne d’InformationS (A.V.I.S) ; CLAM (Montpellier) ; CLEDA (Paris) ; Dignité Animale (Lyon) ; Initiative Citoyenne pour les Droits des Végétariens ; L214 ; Les Animaux de Maurice ; Mouvement socialiste écologiste et autogestionnaire ; Réseau Antispéciste Poitou Charentes ; NEA (Rennes) ; Respect Animal (Lyon) ; Rêv’Animal ; Vegfest ; Veggie Pride === Contact : David OLIVIER, +33 6 42 06 07 47 Or: contact@icdv.info Further information on http://www.icdv.info/. === (1) Decree 2011-1227 of 30 September 2011 ; governmental order of 30 September 2011, published in the Journal Officiel on 2 October 2011 (http://tinyurl.com/DecretCantines); partial English translation here. (2) Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, proclaimed by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 25 November 1981 (
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/religion.htm
), article 1.1.

Press release from EVU:

The French Government Outlaws Vegetarianism in Schools Whoever believes that animals are not ours to eat is now in France a second-class citizen.

EUROPEAN VEGETARIAN UNION – PRESS RELEASE 14 October 2011 A governmental order issued on October 2, 2011(1)

has determined that all meals served in school canteens in France must contain animal products, and that meat and fish will be served at a certain minimum frequency. This implies that by law from now on no vegetarian can eat at any public or private school in France. Six million schoolchildren are now forced to eat animal flesh, whether they wish to or not. For many families lunch at home is not an option. At best, a vegetarian student will be allowed to leave the meat on the plate, and consequently suffer from inadequate and imbalanced meals. Following a law voted last year by the French Parliament(2),

similar decrees will be taken shortly regarding almost all forms of catering from kindergarten to hospital, prisons and retirement homes. Vegetarianism will then have effectively been banned for a large part of the population. These measures ostensibly aim at ensuring the nutritional quality of the meals. Animal flesh is imposed as the only source of good quality protein and iron and dairy products as the only sources of calcium, in disregard of the fact that all these nutrients can be obtained in adequate quantity and quality from plant and mineral sources. The internationally recognized fact that: appropriately planned vegetarian diets, including total vegetarian or vegan diets, are healthful, nutritionally adequate, and may provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of certain diseases well-planned vegetarian diets are appropriate for individuals during all stages of the life cycle, including pregnancy, lactation, infancy, childhood, and adolescence, and for athletes(3)

is flatly ignored. No practical considerations warrant a blanket prohibition of vegetarianism even in those canteens where the management is willing to offer vegetarian or vegan alternatives. These decrees are thus an arbitrary violation of the rights of the vegetarian citizens of France. The European Vegetarian Union wishes to point out that the decision that many citizens have taken not to eat animals is not a mere dietary whim or a nonconsequential choice of lifestyle, but follows, for many of them, from deeply held beliefs about the way animals should be treated. A democratic government cannot arbitrarily restrict the beliefs of its citizens nor the practice thereof. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which is binding on member states including France, holds that: Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right includes freedom to change religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or in private, to manifest religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.(4)

The public debate regarding animal rights and the moral status of animals is active in France as in many other countries. Citizens are entitled to choose freely where they stand on these issues, and those who believe that they cannot, in conscience, accept to eat animals must not be discriminated against. A government cannot settle a philosophical, ethical and political debate by restricting the rights of those who disagree with its own positions. For years, the official policy of the French government has been openly hostile to vegetarianism.(5)

 The French agriculture minister, Bruno Lemaire, declared in January 2010 that the government’s aim in determining its public nutritional policy was to defend the French agricultural model and specifically to counter initiatives such as those of Paul McCartney calling for a reduced consumption of meat.(6) The European Vegetarian Union demands that the recent governmental orders outlawing vegetarianism in school canteens be rescinded and that the French government respect the civil rights of its vegetarian citizens.

 Renato Pichler President European Vegetarian Union Niederfeldstrasse 92, CH-8408 Winterthur Fax: +41 (0)71 477 33 78 http://www.euroveg.eu / president@euroveg.eu Footnotes: 1. Décret n° 2011-1227 du 30 septembre 2011; arrêté du 30 septembre 2011. 2. “Law for the modernization of agriculture and fisheries”, published on July 27, 2010. 3. Position statement of the American Dietetic Association 4. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, article 10.1 5.An example is the site mangerbouger.fr, where the only nutritional advice given to a teenager contemplating becoming a vegan is “By all means, do not follow that diet!”

www.mangerbouger.fr/pro/IMG/pdf/guide_adolescents-2.pdf, page 11). 6.


http://tinyurl.com/

FlashLeFigaroHaving Banned the Burqa,

French Now Ban Les Veggies Press release from Viva!, sent to english media… 19th October 2011 Having Banned the Burqa, French Now Ban Les Veggies THERE will be no meat-free days in French Schools for six million children following a new decree from the French Government ­ all school students will have to eat meat if they want lunch at school.

Taking a packed lunch is not an alternative as they are also banned. Following a law voted in last year, the French parliament has issued a decree (October) that it is forbidden to serve vegetarian meals to school children and that some animal products ­ fish, dairy, meat or offal ­ must be used in every meal. The ban will shortly be extended to kindergartens, hospitals, prisons, colleges and old people’s homes.

There is no opting out and so eating animals becomes a legal obligation in France and the only alternative is to starve. French agriculture minister, Bruno Lemaire, said in January, 2010, that the Government’s aim for nutrition was to defend the French agricultural model and counter initiatives such as those by Paul McCartney and Viva! calling for a reduced consumption of meat. The Government claims, against a battery of science proving the opposite, that the measures will improve the quality of meals served in schools because a balanced diet is impossible without animal products. “At the same time that a 100-year-old, life-long vegetarian man runs a marathon in Canada, the French Government decrees that a vegetarian diet is inadequate”, say Juliet Gellatley, director of vegetarian campaigning group, Viva! “France must be the only country in the world where the health authorities have given up reading scientific research. Whether it is the BMA, American Dietetic Association or the World Health Organisation, the findings are identical ­ animal products are at the heart of the degenerative diseases that kill most people in the West whilst plant-based diets reduce disease risk and extend life. It is the best start in life a child could have “This is such an assault of people’s freedom of conscience and freedom of choice that it drives a coach and horses through the supposed ideals of the European Union ­ by one of its greatest supporters. It is so extraordinary, so Hitlerian, that it is difficult to believe. Having done it in their own country, we’d better all look out because the next thing will be an EU directive banning vegetarianism along with crooked cucumbers and crosses.

The decree can be read in French at
http://tinyurl.com/DecretCantines
.

A French-led petition against the decree can be read in English at


http://www.icdv.info/

For further information contact Juliet Gellatley or Tony Wardle on 07594 943222 or 07864 687057 or 0117 944 1000.

Seven Steps to Reclaiming Your Health


Seven Steps to Reclaiming Your Health

You are what you eat. Your stomach was designed to
break food proteins down into the basic building
blocks of life, amino acids. The acid in your
stomach normally accomplishes that task quite
efficiently. If you eat hard-to-digest proteins,
the task will take longer than if you eat easy-
to-digest proteins.

Hummus will be digested in less than an hour.
A sirloin steak might take five hours. Should you
neutralize the acid in your stomach and take away
your body’s ability to digest food properly, that
food will ferment and putrefy in your stomach for
many hours. You will experience pain and discomfort,
and substances normally digested might exert powerful
effects on your system. These substances include fat,
cholesterol, hormones, antibiotics and pesticides.

The seven steps can be one large jump or seven separate
chapters in your life. Each journey begins with one step
and, in each case, the first step is the most important.

STEP ONE

Eliminate all milk and dairy products. Each sip of milk
contains powerful growth hormones and proteins that cause
powerful effects on your body. Milk buffers gastric acidity
and interferes with digestion. Step one should begin by
abstaining from all milk and dairy products for just six
days. On day seven, eat yogurt, have pizza for lunch,
cheese with dinner and ice cream for dessert. Pay careful
attention to how you feel during the first six days of
this experiment. Mucus, phlegm, digestion, & sleep patterns.

On the seventh day you will light the fuse to an internal
time bomb. It might take one hour and the effects might
take twelve hours. You will notice a distinct change in
your bowel movements about fifteen hours later. That
unpleasant change can be blamed on casein, a milk protein.

Eighty prevent of all milk protein is casein, the same
glue used to adhere a label to a bottle of beer. This
glue is what causes histamines, then mucus. It is the
reason most Americans do not have normal bowel movements.
Recognize the changes in your body and decide if this is
the way you wish to spend the remainder of your life.

STEP TWO

Eliminate poultry. Chickens naturally mature in six months,
not four weeks which is the age that they are often processed
for human consumption. Artificial light cycles and diets rich
in growth hormones produce unhealthy animals. Their feeds
include excrement and body parts from their siblings.

STEP THREE

Eliminate seafood. Insecticides and toxic chemicals run off
into the water. We eat fish that are on the top of their
respective food chain. Their flesh contains concentrated
amounts of pesticides and dioxins.

STEP FOUR

Eliminate pork and beef. As with all animals, the toxins
they eat from vegetables treated with 50 times greater
herbicides and pesticides become concentrated in their
flesh. By eating their bodies, we ingest dangerous
chemicals and powerful hormones.

STEP FIVE

Make your diet one consisting of foods from the FOUR
MAJOR FOOD GROUPS. Fruits, vegetables, legumes and
grains. Read books about your new diet. Frances Ford
Lappe’s DIET FOR A NEW PLANET teaches us that there is
an incredible variety to the 40 different fruits and 40
different vegetables commonly available. Combine the
textures and tastes offered by 20 different beans and
20 grains and you produce a cuisine that is infinitely
more interesting and appealing than the typical American
diet (which consists of three vegetables: catsup,
pickles and potato chips).

STEP SIX

Buy organic. It makes a difference. The difference in price
cannot be measured against the health of you and your loved
ones. DDT is legal in Mexico, and much of your typical
supermarket produce comes from South of the American border.
If you eat a fruit or veggie grown in another country,
chances are that the crate was sprayed with toxic pesticides
before being shipped to America. Organic bananas are a joke
and a deception. APHIS requires that all bananas be spread to
prevent bugs that may damage our crops. An example of one
bug kept out of America is that fruit fly from the
Mediterranean. All foreign crates are sprayed before you
eat their contents.

STEP SEVEN

After step seven, you and your body have earned a rest.
By first giving up milk and dairy products you began the
journey to a new body and spirit. By giving up the consumption
of all foods with faces and mothers, you have eased the
job of digestion and begun the process of cleansing your
body. You have lifted an internal “fog”, placed in your body
organs by nature’s tenacious glue, casein. As the mucus
leaves, your spiritual awareness increases. You will need
less sleep as a result of placing less strain on your
digestive system. It is time for an occasional rest, and
that includes fasting. Now is the time to learn and experiment
with foods. It is also the time to explore your body and to
recognize that food is fuel, and in order to maintain good
health, you should supply your internal engine with clean food.

Robert Cohen

http://www.notmilk.com