Commonly Used …in Chicken Meat


Commonly-Used Poultry Drug Increases Levels Of Toxic Arsenic In Chicken Meat

Posted: 14 May 2013 08:08 PM PDT

The meat from chickens raised with arsenic-based drugs contains considerably higher levels of inorganic arsenic, a very toxic carcinogen, new research from the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future at the Bloomberg School of Public Health has found.

Image Credit: Poultry via Flickr CCImage Credit: Poultry via Flickr CC

While it may sound obvious that if chickens are administered drugs containing arsenic than their bodies will retain and contain some of that arsenic, it has actually long been argued that they would not… Especially with regards to the inorganic form of arsenic. And because of, no doubt, a variety of reasons there are now four arsenicals currently approved for use in poultry by the FDA…

With regards to the new research, this is the first study to “show concentrations of specific forms of arsenic (e.g., inorganic arsenic versus other forms) in retail chicken meat, and the first to compare those concentrations according to whether or not the poultry was raised with arsenical drugs. The findings provide evidence that arsenical use in chickens poses public health risks and indicate that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the agency responsible for regulating animal drugs, should ban arsenicals, experts say.”

 

The press release gets into the specifics of how the research was done:

Conventional, antibiotic-free, and USDA Organic chicken samples were purchased from 10 U.S. metropolitan areas between December 2010 and June 2011, when an arsenic-based drug then manufactured by Pfizer and known as roxarsone was readily available to poultry companies that wished to add it to their feed. In addition to inorganic arsenic, the researchers were able to identify residual roxarsone in the meat they studied; in the meat where roxarsone was detected, levels of inorganic arsenic were four times higher than the levels in USDA Organic chicken (in which roxarsone and other arsenicals are prohibited from use).

Arsenic-based drugs have been used in poultry production for decades. Arsenical drugs are approved to make poultry grow faster and improve the pigmentation of the meat. The drugs are also approved to treat and prevent parasites in poultry. In 2010, industry representatives estimated that 88 percent of the roughly nine billion chickens raised for human consumption in the U.S. received roxarsone. In July 2011, Pfizer voluntarily removed roxarsone from the U.S. market, but the company may sell the drug overseas and could resume marketing it in the U.S. at any time. Pfizer still domestically markets the arsenical drug nitarsone, which is chemically similar to roxarsone. Currently in the U.S., there is no federal law prohibiting the sale or use of arsenic-based drugs in poultry feed. (In January, Maryland became the first U.S. state to ban the use of most arsenicals in chicken feed.)

Lead author Keeve Nachman, PhD, stated, “The suspension of roxarsone sales is a good thing in the short term, but it isn’t a real solution. Hopefully this study will persuade FDA to ban the drug and permanently keep it off the market.”

A large body of previous research has found that chronic inorganic arsenic exposure definitely causes lung, bladder and skin cancers and is strongly associated with a large array of other conditions, including: heart disease, type 2 diabetes, cognitive deficits, developmental disorders, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. As per the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data: at least 75% of all Americans eat chicken regularly.

Perhaps arsenicals are part of what’s contributing to the massive and rapid increase in the occurrence of dementia and other neurological diseases in Western countries during the last 40 years?

“The FDA has not established safety standards for inorganic arsenic in foods, although the agency did, for a brief time in 2011, suggest that concentrations should be well below 1 microgram per kilogram of meat. The levels of inorganic arsenic discovered in the meat where roxarsone was found were two and three times greater than that level.”

But with regards to the maximum level, do you really want ANY arsenic in you food?

Another interesting, and important, finding of the research “is that when roxarsone was present in raw meat, cooking decreased the levels of roxarsone and increased the levels of inorganic arsenic.” That’s certainly something to note….

The new study was just published in the scientific journal Environmental Health Perspectives.

Commonly-Used Poultry Drug Increases Levels Of Toxic Arsenic In Chicken Meat was originally posted on: PlanetSave

The Secret Source of Antibiotics in Our Food


Eye fillet of grass-fed beef.

Eye fillet of grass-fed beef. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Secret Source of Antibiotics in Your Food

A report calls out a dangerous habit used in farming and energy industries. The Secret Source of Antibiotics in Your Food A report calls out a dangerous habit used in farming and energy industries. By Leah Zerbe Topics: chemical farming Share on printShare on emailShare on twitterShare on facebookShare on google_plusone Ethanol byproducts serve as another source of antibiotics in livestock feed. For the last several decades, doctors have been warning about the dangerous practice of routinely feeding antibiotics to healthy animals. Many farmers do this in an attempt to ward off disease in crowded conditions and to speed growth, but public-health researchers have linked the overuse of antibiotics in farming to the sharp rise in hard-to-kill—and sometimes fatal—superbugs in people. While the use of antibiotics in readying farm animals for consumption is no secret to most Americans, another source of antibiotics likely is. A new report from the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy calls out a surprising way the drugs wind up in the livestock many Americans eat: the process of producing ethanol. It All Starts With Corn To create crop-based ethanol, an increasingly common component of U.S. gasoline, producers use yeast to break down its sugars and ferment corn. The distillation process takes place in large vats of warm water, creating the perfect breeding ground for bacteria that could hamper ethanol yields. To counteract this, the report says that ethanol producers have routinely added antibiotics like penicillin and erythromycin to the fermentation tanks. “These antibiotics, distributed by animal drug manufacturers and chemical suppliers, are readily available without a prescription,” according to the report. In fact, they’re completely unregulated by the Food and Drug Administration, the same agency under fire for failing to curtail overuse of antibiotics in farming. So what does creating ethanol have to do with farm animals? The corn mash and liquid slurry by-products created during ethanol production are sold as animal feed. The beef and dairy industry are the biggest consumers of the ethanol by-product–based feed. “Residues of antibiotics in [ethanol-based feed]—the predictable result of adding antibiotics to ethanol fermentation vats—have the potential to cause increased antibiotic resistance, impacting the human population,” the author of the report writes. Don’t Buy Into This Dangerous Style of Farming Until government agencies take action to ban antibiotic use in animal feed, including ethanol by-product feeds, opt for organic, grass-fed dairy and beef. Cows’ digestive systems aren’t built for a corn diet, anyway, so supporting grass-fed operations means you’re supporting healthier cows boasting more nutrients, too. To learn more, read The Guide to Buying Grass-Fed Beef. .By Leah Zerbe Topics: chemical farming Share on printShare on emailShare on twitterShare on facebookShare on google_plusone Ethanol byproducts serve as another source of antibiotics in livestock feed. For the last several decades, doctors have been warning about the dangerous practice of routinely feeding antibiotics to healthy animals. Many farmers do this in an attempt to ward off disease in crowded conditions and to speed growth, but public-health researchers have linked the overuse of antibiotics in farming to the sharp rise in hard-to-kill—and sometimes fatal—superbugs in people. While the use of antibiotics in readying farm animals for consumption is no secret to most Americans, another source of antibiotics likely is. A new report from the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy calls out a surprising way the drugs wind up in the livestock many Americans eat: the process of producing ethanol. It All Starts With Corn To create crop-based ethanol, an increasingly common component of U.S. gasoline, producers use yeast to break down its sugars and ferment corn. The distillation process takes place in large vats of warm water, creating the perfect breeding ground for bacteria that could hamper ethanol yields. To counteract this, the report says that ethanol producers have routinely added antibiotics like penicillin and erythromycin to the fermentation tanks. “These antibiotics, distributed by animal drug manufacturers and chemical suppliers, are readily available without a prescription,” according to the report. In fact, they’re completely unregulated by the Food and Drug Administration, the same agency under fire for failing to curtail overuse of antibiotics in farming. So what does creating ethanol have to do with farm animals? The corn mash and liquid slurry by-products created during ethanol production are sold as animal feed. The beef and dairy industry are the biggest consumers of the ethanol by-product–based feed. “Residues of antibiotics in [ethanol-based feed]—the predictable result of adding antibiotics to ethanol fermentation vats—have the potential to cause increased antibiotic resistance, impacting the human population,” the author of the report writes. Don’t Buy Into This Dangerous Style of Farming Until government agencies take action to ban antibiotic use in animal feed, including ethanol by-product feeds, opt for organic, grass-fed dairy and beef. Cows’ digestive systems aren’t built for a corn diet, anyway, so supporting grass-fed operations means you’re supporting healthier cows boasting more nutrients, too. To learn more, read The Guide to Buying Grass-Fed Beef. … Read the whole article there!

Cujo 1983, Cowjo 2012


Esch coli

Image via Wikipedia

CowJo

Vic Trenton: “There are no real monsters.”
Tad Trenton: “Except for the one in my closet.”
- Cujo, 1983 movie based upon a Stephen King novel

This past week, dairyman Ray Parks lived to tell the
story of a cow attack which could have ended his life.
Seeking revenge, the 72-year-old dairy farmer returned
to his house, loaded his double barrel twin gauge
shotgun, and pumped three bullets into her body. His
agricultural unit did not immediately die.

The rabies-infected cow suffered for three days before
a veterinarian was called to humanely end her life. In
the week previous to the incident, Elsie involunteerily
donated her rabies-infected milk to Georgia dairy lovers.

Yesterday (February 2, 2012), farmer Ray learned that
his entire herd will be quarantined until August of 2012.

The good news is that rabies virus is immediately killed
by pasteurization. The bad news is that the senile 77-year-
old nincompoop gynecologist/turned politician from Texas,
Congressman Ron Paul, continues to promote the consumption
of raw milk from diseased animals.

Constitutionalist Paul supports raw milk by incorrectly
citing Article Seven of the Bill of Rights in the American
Constitution which guarantees life, liberty, and the right
to own property. Paul claims that the U.S. Constitution
guarantees life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
It does not.

Just for the record: It is the Japanese Constitution
which guarantees its citizens life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness. One might wonder about that
after reading Laura Hellenbrand’s UNBROKEN.

In can be argued that no child under the age of five
who drinks raw milk and gets E. coli, salmonella,
camplyobacter, or rabies is pursuing happiness.

Eleven years ago, Notmilk reported cases of cows
infected with rabies:

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/notmilk/message/534

Notmilk wrote:

“On November 12, 1998, the Virology Laboratory of the
Massachusetts Department of Public Health (VLMDPH)
diagnosed rabies in a 6-year-old Holstein dairy cow from
a farm in Worcester County. Further analysis of the cow’s
brain tissue with monoclonal antibodies revealed the cow
was infected with a variant of the rabies virus associated
with raccoons in the eastern United States.

“The cow had been milked 12 times during the week before
death. Milk from the cow had been pooled with milk collected
from other cows, and an unpasteurized portion was distributed
for human consumption. Public health investigations identified
66 persons who drank unpasteurized milk collected from this
dairy during October 23-November 8. All 66 received rabies
inoculations.

“On November 12, 1996, the VLMDPH diagnosed rabies in
a 14-year-old Jersey dairy cow from a different farm in
Worcester County. Analysis with monoclonal antibodies
revealed the cow was infected with a variant of the rabies
virus associated with raccoons in the eastern United States.

“An investigation identified 14 persons who drank unpasteurized
milk collected from this cow during this period. All 14 persons
received rabies injections.”

Robert Cohen
http://www.notmilk.com

Here we stand in the middle of this new world with our primitive brain…


A female mosquito of the Culicidae family (Cul...

Image via Wikipedia

“Here we stand in the middle of this new world
with our primitive brain, attuned to the simple
cave life, with terrific forces at our disposal,
which we are clever enough to release, but whose
consequences we cannot comprehend.”
- Albert Szent-Gyorgyi

Do Mosquitoes Bite?

If the answer is no, then ignore what follows.
If the answer is yes, then you’ve got something
to consider.

If you see a mosquito on your hand, do not swat it!
Consider that mosquito a flying hypodermic syringe.
By swatting, you might successfully inject all of
its potentially infected mosquito-saliva into
your body. Instead, blow it away, just at that
bug might represent birthday candles on a cake.

Next year’s infection might be something that ends
the human race. Only the mosquito-free will survive.

On Saturday, October 30, 2011, the New York Times
reported that genetically engineered mosquitoes
have been released into the Florida environment.

The new/improved mosquitoes contain a DNA-altered
gene to destroy their own young. The entire article:

TINY URL: http://tinyurl.com/3ej3z42

Will that gene be passed on to any mammal the
mosquito randomly bites, just as genes from
genetically engineered crops have spread to
the environment to create new species of
weeds which are immune to pesticides, or
new species of bacteria resistant to antibiotics?

New York Times science reporter Andrew Pollack wrote:

“The results, and other work elsewhere, could herald
an age in which genetically modified insects will be
used to help control agricultural pests and insect-borne
diseases like dengue fever and malaria.”

Just for the record: I am a big fan of the science of
genetic engineering and one day believe that it will help
mankind. For example: Every cornstalk produces one ear of
corn, yet, has the genetic potential to produce six
ears. Of course, that new corn would have to be tested
on well-compensated human volunteers, not laboratory rats.

Yes, I am a fan, but not until pharmaceutical companies
and genetic engineering firms like Monsanto, DuPont and
Dow Chemical (to name a few) get it right.

There were so many errors made during the approval
process for Monsanto’s genetically engineered bovine
growth hormone, that I neither believe nor trust
manufacturers or regulatory agency bureaucrats.

One error (which I have previously written a great
deal about) involves creating a genetically
engineered bovine growth hormone which the FDA
called equivalent to the natural hormone. I found
a publication in an obscure journal written by
Monsanto scientist Bernard Violand admitting that
Monsanto created a “freak amino acid” during the
transcription process. Monsanto withheld that
information from federal regulators. Each time
lysine occurred, it was incorrectly transcribed
as “epsilon-N-acetyllysine”.

Who could have imagined the consequences? Not the
women who contracted ductile breast cancers which
cannot be felt during self-exams. I predicted an
explosion of that form of breast cancer a dozen
years ago, and sadly, my prediction has come true.

For seventeen years, I have been warning about those
errors and providing evidence of massive crimes
against mankind.

Please remember: Nature always finds a way to combat
men’s attempts to play God.

“In nature there are neither rewards nor
punishments; there are consequences.”
- Robert Green Ingersoll

Robert Cohen
http://www.notmilk.com

Killing & Eating Nonambulatory Farm Animals


Datum: Fr, 30 Sept 2011 9:18 am
 

Killing & Eating Nonambulatory Farm Animals

“Because animals are property, we consider as ‘humane treatment’
that we would regard as torture if it were inflicted on humans.”
- Gary Francione

Why do most companion animals seem to die from cancer?
Perhaps it is because of that diseased flesh unfit for
human consumption we call dog food.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned the slaughter
of diseased and infirm cows for human consumption. Many
of these creatures have visible tumors growing from their
bodies. Many of these creatures just fall down and never
again get up.

It is no wonder that cows milked three times per day
only live for 35 months after they birth their first
calf. In order to continuously produce their 24
quarts of calcium-rich milk, they live their lives in
excruciating pain after their bones begin to melt
calcium into their blood which is then reabsorbed by
udders which pass that essential mineral into their milk.
These are continuously stressed creatures. We swallow
and digest their pain.

So, cows become “downers”. There are other reasons cows
go down and cannot stand. Such behavior is often a sign
of a prion disease called bovine spongiform encephalitis,
otherwise known as BSE or Mad Cow Disease. By eating diseased
flesh from these infected animals, or by drinking their
infected body fluids, humans sometimes get a brain-wasting
disease called Cruetzfeld-Jacob Disease, or CJD. SEE:

http//www.notmilk.com/m.html

All of the above has been the introduction to a page 587
column from the September 25, 2011 issue of Hoard’s Dairyman,
the national dairy farm magazine.

The entire story:

“California’s nonambulatory law will be reviewed by the
U.S. Supreme Court. The law bans all nonambulatory
livestock from being slaughtered in the state if the animals
are being processed for food. It was passed in the wake
of the Westland/Hallmark Meat Co. scandal in Chino, Calif.

“Hallmark illegally slaughtered nonambulatory cattle and
sold the beef into commerce. Then, a tape of the act was
leaked onto YouTube. USDA banned the slaughter of all
nonambulatory cattle for processing into the food supply.

“The National Meat Association (NMA) filed the original
lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of California charging that the law violated the Federal
Meat Inspection Act. The high Court has scheduled the appeal
for its 2011-2012 term which begins October 4th.”

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

The extremely disturbing above-referenced video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrxvxewC-gA

The meat and dairy producers have developed a brilliant
strategy and creative solution to this problem. They
have successfully lobbied many state legislative bodies
which have since enacted laws making it a felony crime
for animal rights “terrorists” to film animal abuse.

High-priced lawyers will argue for the dairy and
cattlemen. Who will argue for the cows?

United States Supreme Court Contact Information:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/contact/contactus.aspx

Robert Cohen
http://www.notmilk.com