Bumblebees Locate Specific Flowers By The Electrical Signals They Give Off, New Research finds


 

 

Bumblebees Locate Specific Flowers By The Electrical Signals They Give Off, New Research Finds

Posted: 21 Feb 2013 03:06 PM PST

Bumblebees and other pollinators are able to locate and distinguish the individual electric signals given off by flowers, new research from the University of Bristol has found. The flowers’ use of electric signals to communicate with potential pollinators is a surprise to many researchers, adding to their already impressive visual, ultraviolet, and fragrant advertising methods.

20130221-150428.jpg

The new research is the first to show that pollinators make use of electrical signals for navigation and the pursuit of food. During new research, scientists at Bristol’s School of Biological Sciences found that flowers release varying patterns of electrical signals that are capable of communicating specific information to insect pollinators. The electrical signals likely work in conjunction with other communication tools, such as visual patterns, smells, and ultraviolet markings, to communicate with pollinators.

“Plants are usually charged negatively and emit weak electric fields. On their side, bees acquire a positive charge as they fly through the air. No spark is produced as a charged bee approaches a charged flower, but a small electric force builds up that can potentially convey information.”

 

For the new research, electrodes were implanted into the stems of petunias, and it was observed that as a bee lands on a flower, “the flowers’ potential changes and remains so for several minutes. Could this be a way by which flowers tell bees another bee has recently been visiting? To their surprise, the researchers discovered that bumblebees can detect and distinguish between different floral electric fields.”

This was further explored by giving the bees ‘a learning test’. The test showed that when electric signals were present in conjunction with colors, the bees were much faster at ‘learning’ to distinguish between the colors.

It’s not entirely clear yet how the bees actually detect the electric fields. Currently the researchers are speculating that the rather hairy bodies of bumblebees aid in the detection. Similar to when static electricity makes your hair stand on end.

“The discovery of such electric detection has opened up a whole new understanding of insect perception and flower communication.”

20130221-150537.jpg

Dr Heather Whitney, one of the co-authors of the study, said: “This novel communication channel reveals how flowers can potentially inform their pollinators about the honest status of their precious nectar and pollen reserves.”

Professor Daniel Robert said: “The last thing a flower wants is to attract a bee and then fail to provide nectar: a lesson in honest advertising since bees are good learners and would soon lose interest in such an unrewarding flower.

“The co-evolution between flowers and bees has a long and beneficial history, so perhaps it’s not entirely surprising that we are still discovering today how remarkably sophisticated their communication is.”

The research was just published February 21st in the journal Science Express.

Some more information on Bumblebees and pollinator/flower relations:

“Bumblebees are social insects that are characterised by black and yellow body hairs, often in bands. However, some species have orange or red on their bodies, or may be entirely black. Another obvious (but not unique) characteristic is the soft nature of the hair (long, branched setae), called pile, that covers their entire body, making them appear and feel fuzzy. They are best distinguished from similarly large, fuzzy bees by the form of the female hind leg, which is modified to form a corbicula: a shiny concave surface that is bare, but surrounded by a fringe of hairs used to transport pollen (in similar bees, the hind leg is completely hairy, and pollen grains are wedged into the hairs for transport).”

“Like their relatives the honey bees, bumblebees feed on nectar and gather pollen to feed their young.”

“Bumblebees generally visit flowers exhibiting the bee pollination syndrome. They can visit patches of flowers up to 1–2 kilometres from their colony. Bumblebees will also tend to visit the same patches of flowers every day, as long as they continue to find nectar and pollen, a habit known as pollinator or flower constancy. While foraging, bumblebees can reach ground speeds of up to 15 metres per second (54 km/h).”

“Experiments have shown that bumblebees can use a combination of colour and spatial relationships to learn which flowers to forage from. After arriving at a flower, they extract nectar using their long tongue (‘glossa’) and store it in their crop. Many species of bumblebee also exhibit what is known as “nectar robbing”: instead of inserting the mouthparts into the flower normally, these bees bite directly through the base of the corolla to extract nectar, avoiding pollen transfer. These bees obtain pollen from other species of flowers that they ‘legitimately’ visit.”

“Pollen is removed from flowers deliberately or incidentally by bumblebees. Incidental removal occurs when bumblebees come in contact with the anthers of a flower while collecting nectar. The bumblebee’s body hairs receive a dusting of pollen from the anthers, which is then groomed into the corbicula (‘pollen basket’). Bumblebees are also capable of buzz pollination.”

“In at least a few species, once a bumblebee has visited a flower, it leaves a scent mark on the flower. This scent mark deters visitation of the flower by other bumblebees until the scent degrades. It has been shown that this scent mark is a general chemical bouquet that bumblebees leave behind in different locations (e.g. nest, neutral, and food sites), and they learn to use this bouquet to identify both rewarding and unrewarding flowers. In addition, bumblebees rely on this chemical bouquet more when the flower has a high handling time (i.e. it takes a longer time for the bee to find the nectar).”

“Once they have collected nectar and pollen, bumblebees return to the nest and deposit the harvested nectar and pollen into brood cells, or into wax cells for storage. Unlike honey bees, bumblebees only store a few days’ worth of food and so are much more vulnerable to food shortages.”

Source: University of Bristol and Wikipedia

Image Credits: Dominic Clarke and Daniel Robert; Bumblebee Flower and Bumblebees via Wikimedia Commons

Bumblebees Locate Specific Flowers By The Electrical Signals They Give Off, New Research Finds was originally posted on: PlanetSave. To read more from CleanTechnica, join thousands of others and subscribe to our free RSS feed, follow us on Facebook or Twitter, or just visit our homepage.

Experts Tell NIH to Retire Mosst Research Chimps, But Not All


Chimpanzee

Chimpanzee (Photo credit: Dhammika Heenpella / Images of Sri Lanka)

Experts Tell NIH to Retire Most Research Chimps, But Not All

 

Experts Tell NIH to Retire Most Research Chimps, But Not All

  • This week a group of experts advised the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to permanently retire more than 300 federally-owned chimpanzees, but also recommended leaving 50 behind who could be made available for experiments.
The announcement coincides with the first nine of 110 retired chimps from the New Iberia Research Center arriving at Chimp Haven, a national sanctuary, this week with the rest expected to make their way there over the coming months. Last month the NIH announced it would move them all to a sanctuary, instead of sending 100 of them to the Texas Biomedical Research Institute in San Antonio.
The move to retire the 110 left more than 300 NIH-owned chimps available for invasive research while the NIH’s Council of Councils Working Group decided on how many research chimps it would keep, in addition to evaluating research projects the NIH currently funds and developing strict rules for when they should be used.
The group was established to further debate the issue of using chimps in research after the Institute of Medicine (IOM) issued a report in 2011 concluding that most research on chimps was unethical and unnecessary in biomedical and behavioral research, which was completed at the request of the NIH and in response to a congressional inquiry.
The final report issued this week advised the NIH to permanently retire all but 50 of the agency’s chimps who are currently housed in facilities in Texas and New Mexico to a sanctuary, and that the NIH should begin planning for this “immediately.”
The report proposed standards for their social and physical welfare, including requirements that they live in groups of at least seven, each have a minimum of 1,000 square feet, room to climb, access to the outdoors in all weather and opportunities to forage for food, reports to the New York Times.
The report also recommended stopping six of nine current biomedical research projects that involve immunology and infectious agents, while an additional six ended. There were also 15 less invasive projects that were approved, or conditionally approved, which will need to pass a review before receiving additional funding.
Additionally, the report advised against breeding, and set standards for future experiments, calling for the establishment of an independent committee that would approve study proposals after they pass the NIH’s scientific review and experiments that are expected to be harmful must have a “very high” benefit to humans in order to be approved, according to Daniel Geschwind, co-chair of the working group and a geneticist at the School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles.
While the recommendations are good news, they are not final. NIH Director Francis Collins is expected to respond to them in March, after a 60-day public commend period.
“We are very pleased with the report. Of course, we’d want to see every single chimpanzee recommended to go to sanctuary, but this is a huge step in the right direction,” Kathleen Conlee of the Humane Society of the United States told NPR. “So now it’s time to roll our sleeves up and figure out how we are going to get all these animals to sanctuary and give them the lifetime of retirement that they so deserve.”
Conlee also said the HSUS will be urging Congress to reallocate money being spent on research contracts to Chimp Haven for the care of retired chimps.
Unfortunately, these recommendations will also not apply to privately-owned chimps, whose fates remain unclear. Animal advocacy organizations are still pushing to get the Great Ape Protection and Cost Savings Act passed this year, which will help the ones left behind by phasing out testing for chimpanzees currently in U.S. labs, along with retiring all federally owned chimpanzees and ending transport and breeding programs for great apes intended for research.

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/experts-tell-nih-to-retire-most-research-chimps-but-not-all.html#ixzz2ItXulDjS

Where are University Websites Hiding all their Research?


Scooped by Mariusz Leś
onto Digital Research for Humanities
Are UK universities doing enough to make research accessible to students, funders and the public? Claire Shaw reports

Chemotherapy Negatively Impacts Genetic Coding for Future Generations


Chemotherapy Negatively Impacts Genetic Coding for Future Generations

Andre Evans
Natural Society
2012-02-06 21:02:00 I read this article here: Sott@sott.net

dnagreen_210x131.png

Chemotherapy is an accepted method by the mainstream medical establishment as a means to fight against cancer, but its effectiveness and reliability is highly in question. Now, research even brings into question the effect chemotherapy has on your entire hereditary line, with researchers linking chemotherapy drug usage with DNA mutations that extend to your offspring.

You probably know somebody who has undergone some cancer treatment at one point or another. The effects of chemotherapy on the body are highly destructive, and often leave the cancer patient in a worse state than they were in before.

Unfortunately, using an unnatural chemical substance to effectively blast the cancer cells has the same effect on the healthy functioning cells as well. As a result, most chemotherapy patients are highly damaged by the process and sometimes sustain injuries that are irrevocable.

Three common drugs used for chemotherapy have been found to cause DNA mutations within the users. This is already highly dangerous, but according to new research, this damage may have the ability to pass into future generations. These findings shed light on the long term negative effects pharmaceuticals are having on our bodies. If the bodily effects were not enough to cope with, the use of these treatments may actually have a long term effect on the health of those to come afterward.

“Beauty May be Skin Deep, But Ugly Goes Clear to the Bone” Red Foxx


 ”Beauty may be skin deep, but ugly goes clear to the bone.” -

 Redd Foxx

Everybody needs a hobby. My critics often suggest that I am a prime example, and I do have a hobby. Each day, I spend an hour or more reading scientific journal abstracts. In that way, I often discover treasures; pearls of wisdom. This morning, I found an interesting study published in the February 7, 2012 issue of the journal Proceedings of Biological Science. There is good science, bad science, and goofy science. This one belongs to the third category.

 TITLE: Bad to the bone: facial structure predicts unethical behaviour. AUTHORS Haselhuhn MP, Wong EM. AFFILIATION: University of Wisconsin ***ABSTRACT*** BACKGROUND:

 ”Researchers spanning many scientific domains, including primatology, evolutionary biology and psychology, have sought to establish an evolutionary basis for morality.” FINDINGS: “We show that genetically determined physical traits can serve as reliable predictors of unethical behavior…” “Specifically, we identify a key physical attribute, the facial width-to-height ratio, which predicts unethical behavior in men. Across two studies, we demonstrate that men with wider faces (relative to facial height) are more likely to explicitly deceive their counterparts in a negotiation, and are more willing to cheat in order to increase their financial gain.”

CONCLUSION: “Importantly, we provide evidence that the link between facial metrics and unethical behavior is mediated by a psychological sense of power. Our results demonstrate that static physical attributes can indeed serve as reliable cues of immoral action, and provide additional support for the view that evolutionary forces shape ethical judgement and behavior.” * * * * *

I have extrapolated data from this study and applied same to the solitary target most Americans place faith in, and have identified the face least deserving of our trust:

 http://tinyurl.com/6tbxb4f Speaking of politics

Tribolium castaneum

Image via Wikipedia

..Based upon the above parameters, the face we should least want to occupy the oval office:

http://tinyurl.com/8ycqajw   

Robert Cohen

 http://www.notmilk.com