MoJo Tom Philpott: Charts: How Big Pork Screws Small Towns


Satellite image of farming in Minnesota.

Satellite image of farming in Minnesota. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Charts: How Big Pork Screws Small Towns

—By

| Mon Nov. 12, 2012 4:08 AM PST
                    please, watch my blog, too:  www.schweingehabt.wordpress.com/

I’ve argued often that the food system functions like an economic sieve, draining away wealth. Imagine, say, a suburb served by a handful of fast-food chains plus a supermarket or Walmart or two. Profits from residents’ food dollars go to distant shareholders; what’s left behind are essentially low-skill, low-wage clerical jobs and mountains of generally low-quality, health-ruining food.

But the food system’s secret scandal is that it’s economically extractive in farming communities areas, too—and especially in the places where industrial agriculture is most established and intensive. I first learned about this surprising fact from the Minnesota-based community economics expert Ken Meter, specifially this 2001 study on a farm-heavy region of Minnesota. And now Food and Water Watch, working with the University of Tennessee‘s Agricultural Policy Analysis Center, has come out with an excellent new report documenting the food industry’s effect on several ag-intense regions, with the main spotlight on the hog-centric counties of Iowa, the nation’s leading hog-producing state. …

Read more ….

New Mexico Horse Meat Facility Moves a Step Closer to Operation


Violence
The New York Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/23/business/new-mexico-horse-meat-facility-moves-a-step-closer-to-operation.html?src=recg&pagewanted=print


April 22, 2013

New Mexico Horse Meat Facility Moves a Step Closer to Operation

<nyt_byline>

By

<nyt_text>

<nyt_correction_top>Amid the unfolding horse-meat scandal, a New Mexico slaughterhouse has moved closer to becoming the first in the United States since 2007 to be allowed to process horses for human consumption.“I am recommending to the Dallas district manager that your application be processed, and a grant of federal inspection be issued, provided you meet all other requirements for inspection,” Scott C. Safian, a director at the Agriculture Department, wrote in a letter dated April 13 to Ricardo De Los Santos, owner of the Valley Meat Company.

Mr. De Los Santos has been seeking U.S.D.A. approval for his processing plant in Roswell, N.M., since December 2011.

“Grants will not be issued until an establishment is able to produce a safe product in accordance with the Federal Meat Inspection Act,” said an Agriculture Department spokeswoman, Catherine Cochran.

On Monday, an advocacy group for horses sent a letter to the U.S.D.A., asking it not to grant permission for Mr. De Los Santos to operate the facility because he had failed to disclose two felonies on his original application form, as well as on a second, subsequent form.

“Is this really a guy we want to be operating a regulated business, one in which the U.S.D.A. will rely on his representations?” said Bruce A. Wagman, a lawyer representing Front Range Equine Rescue, the advocacy group.

A. Blair Dunn, the lawyer representing Mr. De Los Santos, said Front Range had erroneously described a case of criminal trespassing as a felony. He said the issue was “another desperate attempt to degrade my clients” by Front Range and the Humane Society of the United States.

“Everything regarding that information has been vetted” through the department’s food safety and inspection service “and has been certified by letter by U.S.D.A. to offer no impediment,” Mr. Dunn wrote in an e-mail.

The issue of horse slaughtering has become contentious in light of a labeling scandal in Europe, where ground beef in processed foods made and sold by companies ranging from Nestlé to Ikea was found to contain horse meat.

On Monday, Robert Redford, who starred in “The Electric Horseman” and “The Horse Whisperer,” lent his voice to the debate in a letter to Equine Advocates, a horse welfare group, explaining his opposition to slaughter. “We need to oppose this unspeakable practice with all our might,” Mr. Redford wrote. “It has no place in our culture.”

Horses have not been slaughtered in the United States since 2007, after Congress forbade the use of federal money for inspection of horse meat. That prohibition fell out of legislation in 2011, and Mr. De Los Santos first applied for inspection in December of that year.

On that application, dated Dec. 13, 2011, Mr. De Los Santos wrote “none” in the section asking applicants to account for any felonies they have committed.

A subsequent application dated March 1, 2012 was filled out the same way, with no note made of any felony.

But on a third application dated March 15, 2013, the section is filled out with Mr. De Los Santos’s name and two convictions, one for criminal trespass in Texas in 1988 and the other for residential burglary there in 1978.

Court records show that Mr. De Los Santos was arrested by the Amarillo police department on Sept. 11, 1989 — his third U.S.D.A. application reported the incident occurring a year earlier — on suspicion of criminal trespass but charged only with a moving violation and convicted of that offense.

He was arrested on Aug. 28, 1978, in Dallam County, Tex., charged with residential burglary and convicted.

In his letter, Mr. Safian indicated that the U.S.D.A. and Mr. De Los Santos had been corresponding for some time on the issue. “We note that your April 4, 2013, submittal contends that the disclosed convictions were previously identified on a 1990 application for federal inspection,” Mr. Safian wrote. “However, for clarification, our records indicate prior disclosure of only the 1978 conviction, and no disclosure of a 1988 conviction prior to submittal of your March 2013 application.”

Nonetheless, Mr. Safian concluded that because of the time that had elapsed since the incidents and “other factors,” he was recommending approval of the application.

Mr. Wagman, the lawyer for Front Range, contended that Mr. De Los Santos now has committed a third felony by improperly filling out his first two applications. Under federal law, it is a felony to knowingly falsify, conceal or materially misrepresent facts submitted on a federal application.

Front Range also forwarded to the U.S.D.A. letters from the New Mexico Environment Department to Mr. De Los Santos, noting various failures related to discharge from what was then known as the Pecos Valley Meat Packing Company, a cattle slaughtering operation the De Los Santos family operated in the facility where they are seeking to slaughter horses.

In 2009 and 2010, the U.S.D.A. itself suspended inspection of Pecos Valley Meats, effectively suspending its operations, after finding problems with its sanitation and food safety program including “inadequate” testing for E. coli and “irregularities” in the segregation and disposal of “specified risk materials.” Those are parts of an animal banned for human consumption because they run a higher risk of contamination with the bovine spongiform encephalopathy prions that transmit mad cow disease. Mr. Dunn said the suspensions were only for a short time.

Some Informations about Poultry Inspection Policy MoJo


Buffalo grazing on rangeland in Crook County, ...

Buffalo grazing on rangeland in Crook County, Wyoming. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

THE MAIN DISH

USDA Ruffles Feathers With New Poultry Inspection Policy

The Obama administration is on the verge of dramatically scaling back the US Department of Agriculture‘s (USDA) oversight of the nation’s largest chicken and turkey slaughterhouses—while also allowing companies to speed up their kill lines.

After the idea was floated last year, it was met by massive pushback from food-safety and worker advocates, who argued that the combination of more speed and fewer inspectors would lead to dangerous conditions for both consumers and workers.

According to a 2012 statement, the department expects to save $90 million over three years by firing inspectors. Meanwhile, the USDA calculates that by increasing kill line speeds, the plan will save the poultry industry more than eight times as much, or $256.6 million each year.  [READ MORE]

http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2013/04/usda-inspectors-poultry-kill-lines-chicken

New Case of Mad Cow Found in California (poor cows)


Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD), H&E

Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD), H&E (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

New Case of Mad Cow Found in California AprNew Case of Mad Cow Found in California April 24, 2012. “

They’re here!” -

Heather O’Rourke, Poltergeist http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9aENGodu5A

Let’s assume for the moment that this was not a California Happy Cow. Happy Cows, as you know, are disease-free, or so we are told by USDA. We are also being told that meat and milk are safe to eat, so that sure must be a relief to American consumers. Before being sent to the rendering facility where her body would have been ground into pet food for companion cats and companion dogs, how much milk over how many years did yesterday’s Mad Cow provide for California boys and girls? A cow filters through her udder 10,000 liters of pus, proteins, & dead white blood cells each day. See: http://www.notmilk.com/m.html One cannot donate blood if he or she has spent more than two weeks in England, home of the original Mad Cow Disease outbreak. If one cannot donate blood because the infectious mad cow disease protein (Prion) can be passed in the blood; AND; If Mad Cow Disease sometimes has a 40 year incubation period; AND; Since Mad Cows are clearly in our milking herd before their lethal diseases are detected; THEN; Do you still lack the wisdom and continue to drink milk or eat concentrated dairy cheeses, butter, and ice cream from animals you know to be diseased? BUT; The good news is twofold. First, dairy is delicious. Second, once infected with the human form of Mad Cow Disease, death comes rapidly. The bad news? There is no bad news. Mad Cow Disease can save our Social Security and pension funds and give America a financially strong future. Robert Cohen http://www.notmilk.com il 24, 2012. “They’re here!” – Heather O’Rourke, Poltergeist http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9aENGodu5A Let’s assume for the moment that this was not a California Happy Cow. Happy Cows, as you know, are disease-free, or so we are told by USDA. We are also being told that meat and milk are safe to eat, so that sure must be a relief to American consumers. Before being sent to the rendering facility where her body would have been ground into pet food for companion cats and companion dogs, how much milk over how many years did yesterday’s Mad Cow provide for California boys and girls? A cow filters through her udder 10,000 liters of pus, proteins, & dead white blood cells each day. See: http://www.notmilk.com/m.html One cannot donate blood if he or she has spent more than two weeks in England, home of the original Mad Cow Disease outbreak. If one cannot donate blood because the infectious mad cow disease protein (Prion) can be passed in the blood; AND; If Mad Cow Disease sometimes has a 40 year incubation period; AND; Since Mad Cows are clearly in our milking herd before their lethal diseases are detected; THEN; Do you still lack the wisdom and continue to drink milk or eat concentrated dairy cheeses, butter, and ice cream from animals you know to be diseased? BUT; The good news is twofold. First, dairy is delicious. Second, once infected with the human form of Mad Cow Disease, death comes rapidly. The bad news? There is no bad news. Mad Cow Disease can save our Social Security and pension funds and give America a financially strong future. Robert Cohen http://www.notmilk.com

How Much Milk is Produced by Factory Dairy Farms?


How Much Milk is Produced by Factory Dairy Farms?

There was a time that dairy farms resembled the
tranquil scenes depicted on milk cartons.

This week (March 1, 2012), the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) released
a report “Farms, Land in Farms, and Livestock
Operations, 2011 Summary” showing that more
than half of the United States milk supply
was produced on farms with 1,000 or more cows.

USDA counted 60,0000 dairy farms in 2011, and
there were 1,750 milking more than 1,000 cows.
Less than three percent of America’s dairies
produce more than 50 percent of our milk.

What other than milk do such farms produce?

A typical 1600 pound Holstein cow produces
42,200 pounds of waste each year. That volume
represents 30,400 pounds of solid waste and
12,800 pounds of urine. Multiply that by
1,000, and the resulting bovine body waste
from such a farm is equal to 42 million pounds,
an amount equal to the waste produced by a city of
500,000 humans.

Human urine is sanitized in waste treatment plants.
Cow waste enters the ground and finds its way to
underground reservoirs or into streams.

As for the solid waste, watch where you step.

On factory farms, urine and feces are mixed and stored
in lakes and dams and then sprayed as fertilizer on
growing fruits and vegetables which end up in supermarkets.

Robert Cohen
http://www.notmilk.com

US-Zirkusunternehmen muss wegen mutmasslicher Verstösse gegen das Tierschutzgesetz eine Geldbusse zahlen


  • Ein US-Zirkusunternehmen muss wegen mutmaßlicher Verstöße gegen das Tierschutzgesetz …

Ein US-Zirkusunternehmen muss wegen mutmaßlicher Verstöße gegen das Tierschutzgesetz eine Geldbuße in Höhe von 270.000 Dollar (200.000 Euro) zahlen. Wie das US-Landwirtschaftsministerium mitteilte, akzeptierte das Unternehmen Feld Entertainment, Muttergesellschaft des Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus, die Strafzahlung als Teil eines Vergleichs. Im Gegenzug würden die Ermittlungen wegen Tierquälerei gegen das Unternehmen eingestellt.

Die Behörden hatten im Zeitraum von 2007 bis 2011 zahlreiche Missstände bei der Tierhaltung des Zirkusbetreibers festgestellt. Dem Landwirtschaftsministerium zufolge verpflichtete sich Feld Entertainment, alle seine Angestellten einer Fortbildung im Tierschutz zu unterziehen. Das Unternehmen erklärte sich zu einer “konstruktiven” Zusammenarbeit mit den Behörden bereit. Zugleich betonte Feld Entertainment, dass es mit dem Vergleich kein Fehlverhalten einräume.

Yahoo-News

Surprising Changes in Per Capita American Food Consumption


 
Public domain photograph of various meats. (Be...

Image via Wikipedia

Image via Wikipedia

Surprising Changes in Per Capita American Food Consumption

“It is not government’s job to mandate responsibility on
our behalf. We have the intelligence and good sense to
make wise consumption choices for ourselves and our
children. It is up to us to do what is best for our
health and our children’s health.
- Michael Crapo (U.S. Senator from Idaho)

What’s happened to meat and dairy consumption
during the 2-decade period between 1990 and 2010?

According to the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA):

http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodConsumption/

Per capita consumption of red meat dropped from
119.4 pounds to 111.7 pounds.

Per capita consumption of chicken increased from
60.6 pounds to 80.0 pounds.

Per capita consumption of liquid milk dropped from
233.3 pounds to 203.4 pounds.

Per capita consumption of cheese rose from
38 pounds to 43.6 pounds.

Bad publicity and real science about milk most
certainly contributed to the decline, but consumers
have been scared into eating additional cheese by
those people who market and promote dairy products
by using calcium scare tactics.

What a mistake! I should have simultaneously become the
UnCheeseman at the same time I became the NotMilkman.

More Bad News For the Animal Rights Movement (& Chickens)

Clearly, the animal rights movement is not waging
a very effective campaign. After first becoming involved
in the AR movement in 1995, I’ve noted how AR groups
have focused upon the plight of abused chickens.

From 1995 until 2000, activists and lobbyists have
increased their altruistic efforts in creating greater
public awareness of the horrible nature in which
chickens live and die. How they are de-beaked. How they
are confined. How they are killed without first being
stunned. By promoting compassionate slaughter laws,
AR organizations have relieved the guilt of chicken
eaters, who now enjoy eating more chicken by supposedly
doing so compassionately.

While red meat consumption has declined by 6.54 percent,
chicken consumption has increased by 32.3 percent!
Overall, the consumption of red meat and chicken
resulted in a combined increase over the past 20
years from 180 pounds per person to 191.7 pounds
per person. That represents a 6.5 percent increase.

Since ten pounds of milk are required to produce one
pound of hard cheese, the dairy “influence” has increased
from 613.3 pounds of liquid milk plus the milk required to
produce the cheese to a whopping 639.4 pounds per person
which represents an actual 4.25 percent increase.

As for the animal rights movement, ask yourself why it is
that total meat and chicken consumption and total dairy
and cheese consumption have increased during the past
20 years? Are the dollars altruistic people donate to
animal rights groups being wasted by huge AR salaries
and groups that make animal welfare their priority?
Larger cages and easier ways for animals to die show
results which A.R. groups distort. The proof is in the
Yorkshire pudding

(Note: Yorkshire pudding is made with milk, eggs,
and fat drippings from the roasted beast.)

Robert Cohen
http://www.notmilk.com

Starling Zinging in the Dead of Night


 

Starling Zinging in the Dead of Night

Have you ever observed a spider weave its web around a struggling fly? Have you ever watched a bird pull a worm from its hole in the ground? Have you ever witnessed a cat stalking a bird? All of the above are nature’s way in which animals live and die. These trapping, hunting, and eating behaviors are natural life and death experiences for insects, birds, and feral felines. Feral felines sometimes stalk, catch, and eat starling birds.

 Dairy farmers face many challenges, one of which is dealing with starling birds. Wisconsin horizons are often darkened by flocks of these hungry winged vertebrates. Starlings become more than a nuisance to dairymen. What they steal from feedlots is later deposited as gooey starling droppings on barnyard fences and machinery. A flock consisting of thousands of starlings simultaneously descends upon open feed troughs and then spread salmonella and other bacteria to cows as they share the cow’s rations.

The United States Department of Agriculture has created a ghastly end of life scenario for these birds.

 Death By Poisoning There is a toxin that is designed to kill starlings by destroying their kidney function. This clever biological weapon is called DRC-1339. The active ingredient, representing 97% of the product is 3-chloro-4-methylbenzamine hydrochloride. Starlings die horrible deaths from this poison. So too do feral starling-eating felines.

Yesterday (November 3, 2011), for the first time in my memory, the dairy industry prompted a compassionate cruelty-free method of ridding a dairy farm of starlings.

http://www.dairybusiness.com

 Dairy Business promoted the clever invention of Todd Weitzman, president and owner of Bird Gard. Bird Gard mimics the sounds of starlings in distress and hearing those cries, starlings do a 180 degree turn and head somewhere else. This new product neither kills nor poisons birds, and it is a welcome relief from past practices. See:

http://www.BirdGard.com

Robert Cohen

That NotMilkMan wrote:


NSRW Dairy Industry 9

Image via Wikipedia

Dairy Dunces are Their Own Worst Enemies

“Facts are ventriloquists dummies. Sitting on a
wise man’s knee they may be made to utter words
of wisdom; elsewhere, they say nothing, or talk
nonsense, or indulge in sheer diabolism.”
Aldous Huxley    

Aldous Huxley

Image via Wikipedia

                

This is going to be a long, cold winter for dairy farmers.
Feed prices have gone through the silo’s ceiling. Milk,
butter, and cheese prices are crashing faster than
Formula-1 race cars. Many dairy cows will be sent to
slaughter because each quart of milk that is taken from
their udders will cost more money to produce than it
will ultimately net for their producer.

A cow will not ask why when it is stunned with a bolt gun
and slashed across the throat with a sharpened knife, rapidly
bleeding to death. Many will meet their fate earlier than
their time. All will ultimately suffer the same death
but not in their prime. Premature slaughter of milk
producing cows actually represents a farmer’s failure,
but the dary industry has a name for this. It is called,
CRT, or cooperatives working together. This common
practice is accelerating. Dairymen who kill their cows
early are well compensated for their failure by producing
less supply, and in theory, raising the demand.

As expenses go up, so does production. As milk prices
crash, dairy farmers are flooding the market with product
which are not getting interest from foreign markets, and
why should they? The American dairy industry spent the
last ten years selling champion cows and technology to
Europe, Asia, Australia and New Zealand, Africa, and
South America. Any markets left? Nope.

Butter and cheese exports have dried up. In late summer,
40 pound blocks of cheddar cheese were selling for $2.10
per pound on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Today, that
same commodity is trading for $1.70.

Butter has melted during that same time period from $2.10
per pound to $1.80.

Dairy farmers were getting $22 per hundred pounds of
milk. Now they are getting under $19.

It’s getting ugly as the first frosts begin to hit much of
the nation. The worst is yet to come.

In their nearsightedness, the dairy industry and the
United States Department of Agriculture have not
protected farmer interests for next year.

Farmers believe that they will plant as much corn next
year as they did this year. Oops. There is a flaw in
their thinking that Notmilk is aware of because we
know the dairy farmer’s business better than many of
them do.

Got seed corn?

How can you grow corn without seeds?

Next year, there will be one-third less seed corn
available for farmers to plant due to severe droughts
followed by severe flooding across America. This has
been a big secret that the media has not reported.

The way I see it, the dairy farmers of America
have just one opportunity remaining, but they had
better act fast.

I have always claimed that my knowledge of their industry
would get them $35 per hundred pounds for their milk,
not the $19 which is the current price.

I may be ready to opt out of my Notmilk contract to
become a free agent. I could be ready to run the dairy
industry out of the ground in which it is now implanted.
Of course, I want New York Yankee C.C. Sabathia-type numbers.
If you now run the dairy industry and have not yet fallen
victim to a mob of dairymen with torches and pitchforks,
call my agent.

“Very often we are our own worst enemy as we
foolishly build stumbling blocks on the path
that leads to success and happiness.”
- Louis Binstock

Robert Cohen
http://www.notmilk.com

Killing & Eating Nonambulatory Farm Animals


Datum: Fr, 30 Sept 2011 9:18 am
 

Killing & Eating Nonambulatory Farm Animals

“Because animals are property, we consider as ‘humane treatment’
that we would regard as torture if it were inflicted on humans.”
- Gary Francione

Why do most companion animals seem to die from cancer?
Perhaps it is because of that diseased flesh unfit for
human consumption we call dog food.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned the slaughter
of diseased and infirm cows for human consumption. Many
of these creatures have visible tumors growing from their
bodies. Many of these creatures just fall down and never
again get up.

It is no wonder that cows milked three times per day
only live for 35 months after they birth their first
calf. In order to continuously produce their 24
quarts of calcium-rich milk, they live their lives in
excruciating pain after their bones begin to melt
calcium into their blood which is then reabsorbed by
udders which pass that essential mineral into their milk.
These are continuously stressed creatures. We swallow
and digest their pain.

So, cows become “downers”. There are other reasons cows
go down and cannot stand. Such behavior is often a sign
of a prion disease called bovine spongiform encephalitis,
otherwise known as BSE or Mad Cow Disease. By eating diseased
flesh from these infected animals, or by drinking their
infected body fluids, humans sometimes get a brain-wasting
disease called Cruetzfeld-Jacob Disease, or CJD. SEE:

http//www.notmilk.com/m.html

All of the above has been the introduction to a page 587
column from the September 25, 2011 issue of Hoard’s Dairyman,
the national dairy farm magazine.

The entire story:

“California’s nonambulatory law will be reviewed by the
U.S. Supreme Court. The law bans all nonambulatory
livestock from being slaughtered in the state if the animals
are being processed for food. It was passed in the wake
of the Westland/Hallmark Meat Co. scandal in Chino, Calif.

“Hallmark illegally slaughtered nonambulatory cattle and
sold the beef into commerce. Then, a tape of the act was
leaked onto YouTube. USDA banned the slaughter of all
nonambulatory cattle for processing into the food supply.

“The National Meat Association (NMA) filed the original
lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of California charging that the law violated the Federal
Meat Inspection Act. The high Court has scheduled the appeal
for its 2011-2012 term which begins October 4th.”

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

The extremely disturbing above-referenced video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrxvxewC-gA

The meat and dairy producers have developed a brilliant
strategy and creative solution to this problem. They
have successfully lobbied many state legislative bodies
which have since enacted laws making it a felony crime
for animal rights “terrorists” to film animal abuse.

High-priced lawyers will argue for the dairy and
cattlemen. Who will argue for the cows?

United States Supreme Court Contact Information:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/contact/contactus.aspx

Robert Cohen
http://www.notmilk.com